Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions

Biotic interactions are central to both ecological and evolutionary dynamics. In the vast majority of empirical studies the strength of intraspecific interactions is estimated using simple measures of population size. Biologists have long known that these are crude metrics, with experiments and theory suggesting that interactions between individuals should depend on traits, such as body size. In spite of this, it has been difficult to estimate the impact of traits on competitive ability from ecological field data, and this explains why the strength of biotic interactions has empirically been treated in a simplistic manner. Using long-term observational data from four different populations, we show that large Trinidadian guppies impose a significantly larger competitive pressure on conspecifics than individuals that are smaller; in other words, competition is asymmetric. When we incorporate this asymmetry into integral projection models the predicted size-structure is much closer to what we see in the field compared with models where competition is independent of body size. This difference in size-structure translates into a 2 fold difference in reproductive output. This demonstrates how the nature of ecological interactions drives the size structure which in turn will have important implications for both the ecological and evolutionary dynamics

Effects of rapid prey evolution on predator-prey cycles

We study the qualitative properties of population cycles in a predator-prey system where genetic variability allows contemporary rapid evolution of the prey. Previous numerical studies have found that prey evolution in response to changing predation risk can have major quantitative and qualitative effects on predator-prey cycles, including: (i) large increases in cycle period, (ii) changes in phase relations (so that predator and prey are cycling exactly out of phase, rather than the classical quarter-period phase lag), and (iii) "cryptic" cycles in which total prey density remains nearly constant while predator density and prey traits cycle. Here we focus on a chemostat model motivated by our experimental system [Fussmann et al. 2000,Yoshida et al. 2003] with algae (prey) and rotifers (predators), in which the prey exhibit rapid evolution in their level of defense against predation. We show that the effects of rapid prey evolution are robust and general, and furthermore that they occur in a specific but biologically relevant region of parameter space: when traits that greatly reduce predation risk are relatively cheap (in terms of reductions in other fitness components), when there is coexistence between the two prey types and the predator, and when the interaction between predators and undefended prey alone would produce cycles. Because defense has been shown to be inexpensive, even cost-free, in a number of systems [Andersson and Levin 1999, Gagneux et al. 2006,Yoshida et al. 2004], our discoveries may well be reproduced in other model systems, and in nature. Finally, some of our key results are extended to a general model in which functional forms for the predation rate and prey birth rate are not specified.Comment: 35 pages, 8 figure

Eco-evolutionary feedbacks in community and ecosystem ecology: interactions between the ecological theatre and the evolutionary play

Interactions between natural selection and environmental change are well recognized and sit at the core of ecology and evolutionary biology. Reciprocal interactions between ecology and evolution, eco-evolutionary feedbacks, are less well studied, even though they may be critical for understanding the evolution of biological diversity, the structure of communities and the function of ecosystems. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks require that populations alter their environment (niche construction) and that those changes in the environment feed back to influence the subsequent evolution of the population. There is strong evidence that organisms influence their environment through predation, nutrient excretion and habitat modification, and that populations evolve in response to changes in their environment at time-scales congruent with ecological change (contemporary evolution). Here, we outline how the niche construction and contemporary evolution interact to alter the direction of evolution and the structure and function of communities and ecosystems. We then present five empirical systems that highlight important characteristics of eco-evolutionary feedbacks: rotifer–algae chemostats; alewife–zooplankton interactions in lakes; guppy life-history evolution and nutrient cycling in streams; avian seed predators and plants; and tree leaf chemistry and soil processes. The alewife–zooplankton system provides the most complete evidence for eco-evolutionary feedbacks, but other systems highlight the potential for eco-evolutionary feedbacks in a wide variety of natural systems

A model for optimal offspring size in fish, including live-bearing and parental effects

Since Smith and Fretwell’s seminal article in 1974 on the optimal offspring size, most theory has assumed a trade-off between offspring number and offspring fitness, where larger offspring have better survival or fitness, but with diminishing returns. In this article, we use two ubiquitous biological mechanisms to derive the shape of this trade-off: the offspring’s growth rate combined with its size-dependent mortality (predation). For a large parameter region, we obtain the same sigmoid relationship between offspring size and offspring survival as Smith and Fretwell, but we also identify parameter regions where the optimal offspring size is as small or as large as possible. With increasing growth rate, the optimal offspring size is smaller. We then integrate our model with strategies of parental care. Egg guarding that reduces egg mortality favors smaller or larger offspring, depending on how mortality scales with size. For live-bearers, the survival of offspring to birth is a function of maternal survival; if the mother’s survival increases with her size, then the model predicts that larger mothers should produce larger offspring. When using parameters for Trinidadian guppies Poecilia reticulata, differences in both growth and size-dependent predation are required to predict observed differences in offspring size between wild populations from high- and low-predation environments

Evolution of placentas in the fish family poeciliidae : An empirical study of macroevolution

The placenta is a complex organ that mediates all physiological and endocrine interactions between mother and developing embryos. Placentas have evolved throughout the animal kingdom, but little is known about how or why the placenta evolved. We review hypotheses about the evolution of placentation and examine empirical evidence in support for these hypotheses by drawing on insights from the fish family Poeciliidae. The placenta evolved multiple times within this family, and there is a remarkable diversity in its form and function among closely related species, thus providing us with ideal material for studying its evolution. Current hypotheses fall into two categories: adaptive hypotheses, which propose that the placenta evolved as an adaptation to environmental pressures, and conflict hypotheses, which posit that the placenta evolved as a result of antagonistic coevolution. These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. Each may have played a role at different stages of the evolutionary process.</p

Fine-scale local adaptation in life histories along a continuous environmental gradient in Trinidadian guppies

&lt;p&gt;1. Theoretical models of life-history evolution predict a continuum of fast to slow life histories, yet most of empirical support for this theory comes from studies that have considered dichotomous environments (i.e. high vs. low food, presence or absence of major predators). Although this approach has been very successful in identifying the signature of local adaptation, it might limit our ability to identify the causes of underlying patterns of phenotypic variation. By studying the variation in life-history traits along continuous gradients, we can gain better insight into the diversity of adaptations exhibited by natural populations.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;2. We studied the evolution of life-history traits along a gradient of predation pressure in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Six localities along the Guanapo–Caroni River drainage were selected with respect to their predator community, going from upstream localities where guppies only coexist with a single gape-limited fish predator, to lowland sites where guppies coexist with a complex fish community. Along this gradient, we characterized the field pattern of phenotypic variation in age and size at maturity and reproductive effort. Further, to determine the genetic basis of this variation, we measured these traits in second-generation laboratory-born fish from the same localities sampled in the wild.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;3. In nature, we found a fine-scale pattern of phenotypic variation in most life-history traits that paralleled the continuous predation gradient. In the laboratory, we observed that reproductive allocation and brood size progressively decrease while age at maturity and interbrood interval progressively increase with a reduction in the predator community, suggesting a genetic basis to the parallel patterns observed in the field for reproductive allocation and offspring number.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;4. However, there were some exceptions to the observed pattern of variation. Females from one low-predation locality matured younger and reproduced more frequently than expected based upon the simple nature of the fish community. We also found significant differences between our field and laboratory results for embryo size, suggesting that this trait is highly plastic.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;5. Our results imply that local adaptation in guppies occurs at a finer scale than has previously been shown. Furthermore, while our results are consistent with predator-driven life-history variation, we also find patterns of plasticity that would not be apparent in the traditional dichotomous approach.&lt;/p&gt